When I was the one writing the editorial for this journal, several years ago I wrote about the worldwide biennials that were labeled as international. In most cases, the majority of the panel of jurors were from the country or region of the venue for the juried exhibition, with the minority of the panel being from other regions of the globe. In the case of Faenza, this was definitely the modus operendi in the past. There would be five jurors with four of them being from Faenza and Rome, or other parts of Italy and the fifth was usually from Europe.
Without claiming that my voice had an effect on the changes, Taiwan took steps to change the nature of their selection of work. Now, for alternating biennials, Taiwan implements a two-step process to select a curator who has international knowledge of contemporary ceramics. That curator proposes a theme and then selects the artists within that theme, spreading the opportunities to all corners of the world. Kudos to them.
The Museum of International Ceramics (MIC) in Faenza states on their website about The Premio Faenza:
At the end of my conversation with one of the five Italian jurors, when I pressed about the disproportionate number of Italians in the exhibition, he reluctantly said that it was political.